What should we learn? How to make a living or how to live a life? Where should we learn it? Who should be responsible for us learning it? Ourselves or the state?
Make a living or make a life?
In the case of universities – it it really to learn how to do something? Or should it be about how to live? What is the ROI of making a living? Just because it is difficult to calculate doesn’t mean that it is not a big or important number.
- What is the school of the future?
- The best teacher I had in school
- The real responsibility of schools and parents
What can be cut, what must be kept?
We are at a time when big cuts are being made in “non-essential” services in all developed countries. What counts as “non-essential”? What is cuttable? What is not? How should we decide what should be taught or not? How should we decide which courses should be free or not?
Should engineering, medicine, physics, maths be free and poetry, history, english and humanities cost money to do? Or the reverse; given that you can get paid a good salary as an engineer, doctor but not so much as a poet or historian…
How should schools, colleges, universities adapt to a world of life-long learning? Technical skills are out of date within 18 months… so what I learnt in university 16 years ago about object-oriented programming in C++ and cognitive psychology is about as old as Socrates, Plato & Aristotle. Will the degree of the future be something that goes parallel to life… perhaps returning to college for 2 weeks every year to update my skills and knowledge?
Back to you…
This is not a post with any answer, just some questions running through my head as I reflect on how the world’s governments will allocate the reductions in spending that are forced by the current economic reality. I welcome your thinking, comments, ideas, links to resources. Have a great day.